Part Two – The Covid-19 Pandemic and Movement Control Order – It this an EOT event in PAM and PWD Standard Form Contracts?
In Part 2 of our update, we will examine the commonly used standard form contracts in Malaysia – Pertubuhan Arkitek Malaysia (PAM) and Public Works Department (PWD) standard form contracts to assess whether the MCO and pandemic will give the contractor the right to apply for an extension of time.
The PAM Standard Form Contracts
Under the standard form PAM Contract 2006 (Without Quantities) and PAM Contract 2018 (Without Quantities), a contractor may be able to apply for an extension of time on account of the Movement Control Order (MCO) or the Covid-19 pandemic.
Article 7(ad) of the PAM Contract 2006 reads as follows:
“…Force Majeure means any circumstances beyond the control of the Contractor caused by terrorist acts, governmental or regulatory action, epidemics and natural disasters…”
(Emphasis added)
Clause 23.1 of the PAM Contract 2006 allows a contractor to apply for an extension of time if there would be delay to the works beyond the completion date caused by any of the relevant events stated in Clause 23.8. Under Clause 23.8(a), Force Majeure is one of the specific relevant events. There are similar provisions in the PAM Contract 2018 edition.
The PWD Standard Form Contracts
The PWD forms take a slightly different approach. In the standard PWD Form 203 (Rev. 1/2010) and PWD Form 203A (Rev. 1/2010), it seems, at first glance, that the MCO and pandemic are not automatically grounds for a contractor to apply for an extension of time as both MCO and pandemic do not fall under the definition of ‘Force Majeure’.
Note, however, that Clause 43.1(i) states that “the Contractor’s inability for reason beyond his control and which he could not reasonably have foreseen at the date of closing of tender of this Contract to secure such goods, materials and / or services as are essential to the proper carrying out of the Works;…” is a ground on which an extension of time may be applied for and granted. Such wording is similar to the wording of many force majeure clauses.
This clause may potentially be used as a ground to seek an extension of time, since it may arguably be said that the MCO and the pandemic may have prevented the contractor from obtaining the required resources, and is a reason beyond his control and which could not have been reasonably foreseen. However, it must be borne in mind that Clause 44.1 on Claims for Loss and Expense does not list delays covered by Clause 43.1(i) as a ground for a claim for loss and expense.
In the standard PWD Form DB (Rev. 1/2010), the provisions for force majeure and extensions of time are similar to those found in PWD Form 203 and 203A.
Other Important Considerations
While it appears that the MCO and the pandemic may give rise to grounds to apply for an extension of time under the PAM and, probably, the PWD standard forms, the procedures and conditions stipulated thereunder must still be complied with. In both contracts, there are no provisions that waive or relax procedural and conditions precedent compliance even with the occurrence of force majeure. Parties ought to be mindful of the following:
Contributed by:
Joshua Chong (Partner)
(E): joshuachong@rdl.com.my
(D): 03-26329876
Chen Huan Yung (Associate)
(E): hychen@rdl.com.my
(D): 03-26329947